Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Kumbar, B. D.
- A Comparative Study of Mysore University and Karnatak University In S&T: Research Output, Citation Impact and Collaboration During 2001-10
Abstract Views :686 |
PDF Views:9
Authors
B. D. Kumbar
1,
B. M. Gupta
2
Affiliations
1 Karnatak University, Department of Library & Information Science, Dharwad 580 003, Karnataka, IN
2 National Institute of Science, Technology & Development Studies, Pusa, K.S.Krishan Road, New Delhi 110 012, IN
1 Karnatak University, Department of Library & Information Science, Dharwad 580 003, Karnataka, IN
2 National Institute of Science, Technology & Development Studies, Pusa, K.S.Krishan Road, New Delhi 110 012, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 50, No 5 (2013), Pagination: 573-590Abstract
The study provides a comparative assessment of the research contribution of the Mysore University and the Karnatak University in terms of publications output in science and technology, its growth and citation impact during 2001-10. It analyses the strong and weak subject areas of universities research and their citation impact. It describes the international collaborative share of research output of the universities at the overall level, indicating the contribution of the major collaborating partner countries. It also provides analyses of the national collaborating links of the two universities; with a view to study their collaborating linkages with academic institutions, institutes of national importance, research institutions and industry. It also studies the contribution and citation impact of the top 15 most productive authors and also the productivity of their most productive journals, where the two universities authors have published.Keywords
Mysore Univeristy, Karnatak University, Comparative Study, Citation Impact, Collaboration, S&T Research Output.References
- Jeevan, V.K.J. and Gupta, B.M. (2002) A scientometric profile of research output from Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur. Scientometrics, 53(1): 165-68
- Jeevan, V.K.J. and Gupta, B.M. (2001) R&D Performance of different departments of IIT, Kharagpur. Journal of Library & Information Science, 26(2): 129-43
- Singh, Y; Gupta, B.M. and Kumar, S. (2005) Research contributions and impact of research of Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, 1993-2001. Annals of Library & Information Studies, 52(1): 8-14
- Kumbar, Mallinath; Gupta, B.M. and Dhawan, S.M. (2008) Growth and impact of research output of University of Mysore, 1996-2006: A case study. Annals of Library & Information Studies, 55(3): 185-95
- Tapaswi, M.P. (2011) Growth in the productivity of an organization-Tracing the cause. In. S.L.Sangam et al, Editors. Scientometric Studies. Dharwad; Department of Library & Information Science, Karnatak University. 56-62.
- Gupta, B.M. and Sangam, S.L. (2011) Contribution and impact of Karnatak University publications during 1999-2008: A study in comparison with three other universities in Karnatak. In. S.L.Sangam et al, Editors. Scientometric Studies. Dharwad; Department of Library & Information Science, Karnatak University. 89-113.
- Use of UGC-Infonet E-Journals Consortium by Faculty Members and Research Scholars of Karnatak University, Dharwad:A Study
Abstract Views :391 |
PDF Views:11
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Studies in Library and Information Science, Karnatak University, Dharwad 580 003 Karnataka, IN
1 Department of Studies in Library and Information Science, Karnatak University, Dharwad 580 003 Karnataka, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 46, No 1 (2009), Pagination: 61-72Abstract
UGC-Infonet E-Journals Consortium launched by UGC is one of the biggest and ambitious programmes in the history of higher education in India. The main objective of this programme is to facilitate the research and academic community of the country by providing them nascent, authentic and scholarly literature from all parts of the world with the help of state-of-the-art technology. This article deals with the usage of UGCInfonet E-Journals Consortium by the faculty members and research scholars of Karnatak University, Dharwad.Keywords
UGC Infonet Programme, Consortium, Electronic Sources of Information.References
- Okerson (Ann). Are we there yet? Online e-resources ten years after. Library Trends. Vol. 48(4); 2000; spring; p671-693.
- Potter (W G). Recent trends in statewide academic library consortia. Library Trends. Vol. 45(3); 1997; p416-434.
- http://www.inflibnet.ac.in
- Publication Productivity of Tata Institute of Social Sciences:A Scientometric Study
Abstract Views :300 |
PDF Views:12
Authors
Affiliations
1 Sir Dorabji Tata Memorial Library, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai 400 088, IN
2 Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110 067, IN
3 Scientific Information Resource Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400 085, IN
4 Department of Library and Information Science, Karnatak University, Dharwad 580 003, IN
1 Sir Dorabji Tata Memorial Library, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai 400 088, IN
2 Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110 067, IN
3 Scientific Information Resource Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400 085, IN
4 Department of Library and Information Science, Karnatak University, Dharwad 580 003, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 43, No 4 (2006), Pagination: 363-374Abstract
This study attempts to analyse quantitatively 358 publications published by the social scientists of Tata Institute of Social Sciences during 2001-2004 in various Departments and Research Units for authorship pattern and collaboration trend. The results indicate that 90.22 % of papers were single authored followed by two authored papers - 5.86 % and three authored papers - 3.35 %. Most prolific authors were Shalini Bharat (21), M. M. Koganuramath (18), Mallikarjun Angadi (13), R. N. Sharma (13), Chhaya Datar (12), Siva Raju (12), and Sarthi Acharya (10). The most preferred journals by the social scientists were: Economic and Political Weekly, Indian Journal of Social Work and Indian Journal of Labour Economics, with four papers each. Publication Density observed in the present study was 1.46.Keywords
Scientometrics, Bibliometrics, Institutional Studies, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Publication Productivity, Authorship Pattern, Collaboration Coefficient, Author Productivity, Channels of Communication, Bradford Distribution, Social Sciences.References
- Pritchard (A). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation. Vol. 25; 1969; p348-349.
- Goel (K); Garg (K C). Social Science Research in India: a bibliometric study. Collection Management. Vol. 17; 1993; p95-104.
- Goel (K). Bibliometrics of social science research in India. University News. Vol. 39; 2001; p9-15.
- Koganuramath (M M); Angadi (M); Kademani (B S). Bibliometric dimension of innovation communication productivity of Tata Institute of Social Sciences. Malayasian Journal of Library and Information Science. Vol.7 (1); 2002; p69-76.
- Kalyane (V L); Kalyane (S V). Scientometric dimensions of innovation communication productivity system. Annals of Library Science and Documentation. Vol. 38(1); 1991; p8-29.
- Kademani (B S); Vijay Kumar; Surwase (G); Anil Sagar; Lalit Mohan; Gaderao (C R); Anil Kumar; Kalyane (V L); Prakasan (E R). Scientometric dimensions of innovations communication productivity of the chemistry division at Bhabha atomic Research Centre. Malayasian Journal of Library and Information Science. Vol.10 (1); 2005; p65-89.
- Yankevich (W F). Analysis of publication invention productivity in some Soviet academic institutions. Scientometrics. Vol.4; 1982; p431 - 437.
- Carpenter (M P); Harris (M). Bibliometric profiles for British academic institutions: an experiment to develop research output indicators. Scientometrics. Vol.14(3-4);1988; p213-233.
- van Ran (A). Advanced bibliometric methods for the evaluation of universities. Scientometrics. Vol.45; 1999; p417-423.
- Subramanyam (K). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: a review. Journal of information science. Vol.6; 1983; p33-38.
- Scientific Productivity of Polymer Science Research: A Scientometric Study
Abstract Views :375 |
PDF Views:21
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Library and Information Science, Karnatak University, Dharwad–580 003, Karnataka State, IN
1 Department of Library and Information Science, Karnatak University, Dharwad–580 003, Karnataka State, IN
Source
Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management), Vol 51, No 1 (2014), Pagination: 51–57Abstract
The present study discusses the scientific productivity of polymer science research as reflected in J-Gate for the period from 2000-2009. This study investigates the authorship pattern, geographical distribution of contributors, highly productive authors, highly preferred journals by the scientists, sectoral distribution, Degree of Collaboration (DC) and Collaborative Co-efficient (CC) and growth pattern of polymer science research by calculating relative growth rate and doubling time for publication.Keywords
Scientometrics, Polymer Science, Scientific Productivity, J-Gate.References
- Septo, R; Horie, K; Kitayama, T. and Abe, A. (2003). Mission and challenges of polymer science and technology. Pure Applied Chemistry, 75(10):1359–1369.
- Sperling, L.H. (2005). Introduction to Physical Polymer Science. Ed 4. New Jersy: John Wiley and Sons. ISBN: 978-0-471-70606-9
- Lawani, S.M. (1980). Quality, collaboration and citation in cancer research: a bibliometric study [Ph.D. Theses]. Florida: Florida State University.
- Subramanyam, K. (1983). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: a review. Journal of Information Science, 6(1): 33–38.
- Ajiferuke, I; Burell, Q, Tague, J. (1983). Collaborative coefficient; a single measure of the degree of collaboration: a review. Journal of Information Science, 6(1): 421–433.
- High Productivity Environmental Research Organizations in India: a Study of their Performance for the Period 2008-12
Abstract Views :322 |
PDF Views:27
Authors
Affiliations
1 Sri Venkateshwar University, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, IN
2 Karnataka University, Department of Library and Information Science, Dharwad-580003, Karnataka, IN
3 3#1173, Sector 15, Panchkula-134113, Haryana, IN
1 Sri Venkateshwar University, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, IN
2 Karnataka University, Department of Library and Information Science, Dharwad-580003, Karnataka, IN
3 3#1173, Sector 15, Panchkula-134113, Haryana, IN